In a Database Management System (DBMS), multiple transactions often run at the same time to improve performance and efficiency. However, when these transactions compete for the same resources (like tables, rows, or locks), conflicts can occur. One of the most serious issues in such situations is Deadlock.
Deadlock is a condition where two or more transactions are waiting for each other’s resources, but none of them can proceed. As a result, the system gets stuck, and transactions remain in an endless waiting state.
Example of Deadlock
Imagine two transactions:
- Transaction T1 locks Resource A and needs Resource B.
- Transaction T2 locks Resource B and needs Resource A.
Now, both T1 and T2 are waiting for each other to release the resource. Since neither will release until it gets what it needs, both transactions are “stuck.” This is a deadlock situation.
Necessary Conditions for Deadlock
For a deadlock to occur in a DBMS, the following four conditions must hold simultaneously (known as Coffman’s conditions):
- Mutual Exclusion – At least one resource must be held in a non-shareable mode.
- Hold and Wait – A transaction is holding one resource and waiting for another.
- No Preemption – Resources cannot be forcibly taken away; they must be released voluntarily.
- Circular Wait – A closed chain of two or more transactions exists, where each is waiting for a resource held by the next.
If all four conditions are true, a deadlock may occur.
Methods to Handle Deadlock
There are four common approaches to deal with deadlocks in DBMS:
1. Deadlock Prevention
This method ensures at least one of the four necessary conditions never holds. For example:
- No Circular Wait: Impose a fixed order in which resources are requested.
- Hold and Wait Restriction: Require a transaction to request all resources at once.
- Preemption: Allow the system to take resources away from a transaction if needed.
Advantage: Avoids deadlocks completely.
Disadvantage: May reduce system utilization because transactions can be delayed unnecessarily.
2. Deadlock Avoidance
In this method, the system analyzes each request and decides whether to grant it or make the transaction wait. The Banker’s Algorithm is a famous technique for deadlock avoidance.
It ensures the system never enters an unsafe state where deadlock could occur.
Advantage: Deadlocks are avoided dynamically.
Disadvantage: Requires advance knowledge of resource requirements, which is not always practical.
3. Deadlock Detection
Here, the system does not prevent or avoid deadlock but allows it to happen. Then, it periodically checks for deadlocks using wait-for graphs.
- A wait-for graph is a directed graph where nodes represent transactions and edges represent waiting relationships.
- If the graph has a cycle, deadlock exists.
Advantage: Efficient when deadlocks are rare.
Disadvantage: Requires extra overhead for detection and resolution.
4. Deadlock Recovery
Once a deadlock is detected, the system must break it by choosing a victim transaction to roll back.
- Victim Selection: The system picks the transaction that is least costly to roll back.
- Rollback: The chosen transaction is undone, releasing its resources.
- Starvation Prevention: Ensure the same transaction is not always chosen as a victim.
Real-Life Analogy
Think of deadlock like two people crossing a narrow bridge from opposite sides:
- Person A is halfway across and won’t move back.
- Person B is also halfway across and won’t move back.
Both are stuck because neither is willing to give way. The system (bridge) is blocked until one person retreats.
Conclusion
Deadlock is a critical issue in DBMS that occurs when transactions wait for each other’s resources in a circular chain. It can severely affect system performance if not handled properly.
To deal with deadlocks, DBMS uses techniques like prevention, avoidance, detection, and recovery. The choice of method depends on system requirements, frequency of deadlocks, and performance considerations.
In short, understanding deadlock and its solutions is essential for building efficient and reliable database systems.